|
||||||||||||
Search: |
Monday,
November 19, 2001 The
federal bill, S. 543, the Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act of 2001,
would prohibit group health plans and group health insurance issuers
from providing mental health benefits different from medical and
surgical benefits. Democrats in the Senate recently tagged the bill on
to H.R. 3061, the fiscal year 2002 Health and Human Services budget
bill, after it passed the House without a mental health parity clause.
The appropriations bill, sponsored by Sens. Paul Wellstone (D-MN) and
Pete Domenici (R-NM), is now being debated in conference committee. Similarly,
the state legislation, House Bill 33, sponsored by Rep. Lynn Olman Jr.
(R-Maumee), would require insurance companies to cover the diagnosis,
care and treatment of mental illness and substance abuse or addiction
with benefits no less extensive than those provided for all other
physical diseases and disorders. The bill is currently in the House
Insurance Committee and is not expected to be enacted this session. Under
contention with the federal bill is the cost associated with requiring
employers to provide the additional coverage. The Congressional Budget
Office (CBO) estimates that insurance premiums would increase only .9
percent. However, CBO estimates the higher premiums would cause
employers to reduce wages and benefits to employees. The resulting
decreases in taxable income could lead to a $5.4 billion loss in federal
revenues over the next ten years. The bill contains a clause that would
exempt small businesses from the requirement. The federal bill would
preempt less stringent state laws. It would not preempt the Ohio bill,
if both are enacted. The American Hospital Association supports the federal legislation. While OHA has not yet stated an official position on S. 543, hospitals generally oppose new requirements on insurance plans because they traditionally increase premiums and the number of uninsured. (Jonathan Archey, jonathana@ohanet.org) DAILY NEWS CLIPS For your daily health care news digest, go to the Hannah News Service's StateHealthClips.com. University
Hospitals, CWRU negotiating for strength in unity Sports
medicine explosion prompts hospitals to invest in athlete training
facilities UHHS
bond plan triggers credit review Tuesday, November 20, 2001
AHA asserts CMS’s rule-making practices
have violated the Administrative Procedure Act and says the Association
of American Medical Colleges and the Federation of American Hospitals
concur with AHA’s position. AHA asked that the agency delay the
rule’s effective date of Jan. 1 to allow for meaningful participation
in the rulemaking by affected hospitals The rules to which AHA is referring call
for cuts in Medicare payments to hospitals for “pass-through”
devices, drugs and biological products A final rule released Nov. 2 is only half of what was expected. CMS states its release of specific ambulatory payment classification (APC) rates will be delayed until Dec. 1, at best, which according to AHA will not allow sufficient time for public scrutiny and input by hospitals. (Charles Cataline, charlesc@ohanet.org) How
Do You Like to Receive Information? DAILY NEWS CLIPS For your daily health care news digest, go to the Hannah News Service's StateHealthClips.com. Children's to add
new entrance and garage in $81M expansion Blood donations
drop after news report OPINION: The
medical mating dance Wednesday, November 21, 2001 JCAHO
said it is paying particular attention to emergency management planning
during the survey process. A copy of the report is available in a
special issue of "Perspectives" at www.jcrinc.com/perspectivesspecialissue. DAILY NEWS CLIPS For your daily health care news digest, go to the Hannah News Service's StateHealthClips.com. Commissioners
tie old string to county bond for hospital CWRU,
University Hospitals agree on affiliation, won't tell terms Children's
Hospital unveils expansion plan |
|||||||||||