|
Medical
Liability Insurance
A Threat to Patient Access
to Health Care
Resources
U.S. Med Mal
Costs
Continue
Upward Trend
Towers
Perrin
issued in
late 2008
its 2008
Update on
U.S. Tort
Cost Trends
and found
that medical
malpractice
tort costs
continued
upward
during 2007,
but at a
more
"modest"
rates than
earlier this
decade. The
report opines
that "tort
reforms in
several
states have
contributed
to this
result."
However
concern was
expressed
that recent
trends could
change due
to the
reversal by
some state
courts of
tort reforms
as well as
the growing
emphasis on
"never
events"
(medical
errors that
should never
happen).
Specifically,
the report
found that
medical
malpractice
tort costs
increased
from $30.1
billion in
2006 to
approximately
$30.4
billion in
2007. Since
1975, med
mal tort
costs have
increased
at an annual
rate of
10.8%
compared to
8% for all
other tort
costs. Find
the report
at
www.towersperrin.com/.
Tort Reform
Reduces
Premiums and
Loss
Volatility,
Increases
Number of
Insurers
Researchers
from the
University
of Iowa and
Georgia
State
University
issued a
report in
April 2008
that found
"tort reform
decreases
premiums and
loss
volatility
and
increases
the number
of insurers
in the
market."
They also
found that
the impact
of tort
reform on
the market
depends upon
estimates by
insurers of
the
probability
the tort
reform will
withstand
judicial
scrutiny,
finding that
insurers are
less likely
to reduce
premiums if
they
conclude the
tort reform
will not be
upheld by
courts. See
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2008/09/23/93982.htm.
Pacific
Research
Institute
Credits Tort
Reform for
Ohio
Improvement
In March
2008, the
Pacific
Research
Institute
released its
annual U.S.
Tort
Liability
Index. For
the first
time
Ohio
ranked 4th
best in the
nation and
was
designated a
“saint” – a
state with
“relatively
strong tort
rules” and
low costs or
few
litigation
risks.
According to
PRI, without
tort reform,
Ohio
would have
ranked 41st
in the
country.
But because
of tort
reform,
Ohio’s
legal
climate now
surpasses
all of our
neighbors:
Michigan
– 22nd;
Kentucky
– 34th;
Pennsylvania
– 31st;
Indiana
– 11th.
Find the
report at
http://liberty.pacificresearch.org/press/pacific-research-institute-releases-2008-state-by-state-ranking-of-the-best-and-worst-tort-systems-in-america.
Med-Mal and
Tort Reform
in the News
An article
in the May
17, 2008
edition of
The Wall
Street
Journal
online,
titled "Why
Doctors Are
Heading to
Texas",
credits tort
reform as
the reason
7,000
physicians
have flooded
into Texas
in the past
few years.
The writer,
Joseph
Nixon,
attributes
the 2003
enactment of
a $250,000
non-economic
damage cap
along with
other tort
reforms in
2003 and
2005 as the
reason for
the influx
of doctors
into urban,
rural and
underserved
areas of the
state.
Nixon also
cites a
dramatic
reduction in
liability
insurance
premiums and
increase in
hospital
charity care
resources as
direct
benefits of
tort
reform.
Regarding
the latter,
he writes
that
Christus
Health, a
nonprofit
Catholic
health
system, has
saved in
four year
$100 million
it would
have spent
on premiums
and lawsuit
defense.
Ohio
Obstetricians
Still Paying
High Medical
Liability
Rates
A study by
the
Associated
Press in
March 2008
found that
medical
liability
rates remain
near
historical
highs, and
that the
number of
doctors
listing
obstetrics
and
gynecology
as their
primary
specialty has
dropped 5%
from 2002.
The report
found that
obstetricians
in the
Cleveland
area were
paying a
base rate of
$194,293 to
one large
insurer,
compared
with $84,029
in 2001.
While the
article
notes the
enactment in
2005 of a
cap on
non-economic
damages, it
fails to
note that
the Ohio
Supreme
Court has
not ruled on
the
constitutionality
of that cap,
thereby
making it
difficult
for
actuaries to
predict
future
settlements
and verdicts
and the
rates that
must be
charged to
eventually
pay them.
Find the AP
article at
http://blog.cleveland.com/medical/2008/03/five_years_later_falling_insur.html.
AMA: Damage
Caps Work
Medical
liability
premiums are
on average
at least 17%
lower and
the supply
of
physicians
in high-risk
specialties
4%-7% higher
in states
with caps on
non-economic
damages,
according to
a
report released
yesterday by
the American
Medical
Association.
The report
summarizes
the research
on medical
liability
reform since
2006,
including
one study
that
suggests a
$250,000 cap
on
non-economic
damages
would reduce
medical
liability
premiums
nationally
by $1.4
billion. The
report is
posted at
www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/363/prp2007-1.pdf.
California
Med Mal Cap
Continues to
Work
The Los
Angeles
Times reported
in late
December
2007 that
malpractice
lawsuits in
California
"appear to
have dropped
significantly
since the
state capped
pain and
suffering
awards" at
$250,000.
Filings
dropped 48%
in Los
Angeles and
29% in
Orange
County since
2001, and
the number
of suits was
down in
eight of the
10 largest
counties.
Malpractice
premiums had
risen by
one-third
the national
average
since 1991
when the
non-economic
damage cap
was adopted.
Ten Cents of
Every
Healthcare
Insurance
Dollar Spent
on Liability
and
Defensive
Medicine
The
international
financial
consulting
firm
PriceWaterhouseCoopers
estimates
that ten
percent of
every dollar
spent on
health insurance
premiums is
attributed
to the costs
of liability
and
defensive
medicine.
(“The
Factors
Fueling
Rising
Healthcare
Costs 2006”
PriceWaterhouseCoopers,
January
2006). The
report is
posted at
http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/BB82984D3A7DF2A485257267003C98BC
Ohio ACOG
Section:
OBs Still
Leaving
The Ohio
section of
the American
College of
Obstetricians
and
Gynecologists
(ACOG)
surveyed the
state's 900
obstetricians/gynecologists
and
found that
67% had
dropped
obstetrics
or reduced
the amount
of high risk
care they
accept.
Over 100 OB-Gyns
reported
leaving the
state or
retiring
early. ACOG
reports "the
reason is
the
prohibitive
cost of
medical
liability
insurance
and the
extremely
high cost of
'tail
coverage'
due to the
long statute
of
limitations
in Ohio."
Rates
reportedly
range as
high as
$211,000,
and tail
coverage
rates range
as high as
$400,000.
More
information
may be
available
from
www.acog.org.
Influx of
Doctors in
Texas
Confirms
Importance
of Reform
The Texas
Press
Association
reported
March 1,
2007 that
enactment of
a $250,000
non-economic
damage cap
in 2003
has led to a
backlog of
out-of-state
doctors
seeking a
Texas
medical
license. A
record 4,
2036
applications
were
received by
the Texas
Medical
Board in
2006, 34%
more than in
2005. 82%
of
applicants are
from other
states such
as New York,
Florida,
Illinois and
Pennsylvania.
See
www.texaspress.com/pressreleases/nixon030107.html.
Defensive
Medicine
Pegged at
$124
Billion,
Creates 3.4
Million
Uninsured
A report
from the
Pacific
Research
Institute
issued March
27,
2007 finds
that medical
liability
concerns
result in
$124 billion
in defensive
medicine
expenditures,
which
increased
the number
of uninsured
by 3.4
million.
The report
estimates
direct and
indirect
tort system
costs at
$865 billion
a year or
more than
$9,800 per
family.
Tort reform
is
recommended
to make the
tort system
more
efficient
and less
costly. The
article is
available at
www.pacificresearch.org.
AMA Report
shows Damage
Caps Work
The
American
Medical
Association
issued a
report
showing that
non-economic
damage caps
on medical
malpractice
verdicts
slow losses
and improve
the supply
of
physicians
in a state.
"Clearly,
the body of
research on
the impacts
of tort
reform shows
that caps
have
resulted in
lower growth
in medical
liability
losses in
states that
passed caps
than in
states that
did not.
The report
is available
through the
AMA web site
at
www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/363/prp200502caps.pdf.
Manhattan
Institute: Med Mal
Premiums Due to
Payouts
The cost of medical
malpractice
insurance in New
York was linked
directly to the
state’s malpractice
litigation awards
and not the cyclical
nature of insurance
pricing, according
to a study issued by
the nonpartisan
Manhattan
Institute’s Center
for Legal Progress.
Other findings
include a showing
that premiums are
not explained by
insurance industry
gouging, and that
“malpractice tort
awards and thus
insurance premiums
can vary
dramatically for
reason having little
or nothing to do
with negligence.”
The study is posted
at
www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cjr_10.htm.
Meritless Claims and a
Costly System
About 40 percent of the
medical liability cases
filed in the U.S. are
groundless, according to
a Harvard School of
Public Health study
published in the New
England Journal of
Medicine (NEJM) on May
11, 2006. The study
found three percent of
claims analyzed were
filed by patients who
had no injury and 37
percent of cases lacked
evidence of a medical
mistake. In general, the
study found that some
meritless claims were
paid while some
meritorious claims were
not paid. The study also
found that 54 cents of
every dollar spent by
the system went to
administrative expenses,
including lawyers,
experts and court costs.
The NEJM article is
available online at
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/354/19/2024.
Majority of Americans
Support Medical Liability
Reform
Three-quarters of Americans
want their elected
representatives to support
comprehensive medical
liability reform, including
reasonable limits on
non-economic damages,
according to a new
survey
by Harris Interactive for
the Health Coalition on
Liability and Access. A
similar proportion of
respondents believe their
access to affordable,
high-quality health care is
threatened because medical
liability costs are forcing
doctors out of medicine,
while 64 percent said
medical liability lawsuits
are one of the primary
reasons behind rising health
care costs. The poll results
are posted at
www.hcla.org/releases.html.
Non-Economic
Damage Cap Working in Texas
The Doctors Company, one of the
largest insurers of physician
medical malpractice coverage,
announced in March 2006 an average
18 percent reduction in physician
insurance rates in Texas. The
reduction follows a 14 percent
reduction, on average, made during
2005. Additionally, Texas has seen
an increase in the number of
specialists such as obstetricians,
orthopedic surgeons and emergency
medicine specialists since 2004. In
announcing the 2006 rate reduction,
The Doctors Company attributed the
rate reductions and increased number
of specialists to passage by Texas
voters of a $250,000 non-economic
damage cap in 2004.
AMA Rejects “Angoff
Report”
The American Medical Association (AMA)
issued an assessment of the “Angoff Report,”
calling it a “misrepresentation of the
medical liability insurance industry." The
AMA statement cites insurance industry
experts as finding that “the financial
measures that Angoff looks at are
meaningless, if not misleading, and his
conclusions are without merit.” The AMA
analysis is posted at
www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/363/angoff-prp.pdf.
Plaintiff Lawyers Issue Another Sham Report
Medical malpractice plaintiff lawyers
issued in December 2005 another specious report
claiming that medical malpractice insurance
companies filed erroneous information with state
insurance agencies in order to justify the
dramatic rate increases in recent years. The
report was issued by the Foundation for Taxpayer
and Consumer Rights and concludes that from 1986
to 1994 the industry reported to regulators
losses of $39.6 billion but actually paid only
$26.7 billion, 31 percent less. The Physician
Insurers Association of America responded with a
letter.
American Academy of Actuaries Calls Angoff
Report "Unsound"
The American Academy of Actuaries
(Academy) took the rare step of issuing a
statement regarding the "Angoff" report,
which asserts that medical liability insurance
companies have caused the insurance crisis and
have been profiting at the expense of physicians
and hospitals. The Academy calls the Angoff
report "incomplete, actuarially unsound, and
misleading". The Academy is a non-profit,
professional membership organization founded in
1965 and currently with 15,000 members.
HCLA Study Refutes Angoff Study: Medical
Liability Crisis Not Caused by Insurers
A comprehensive
analysis of the financial performance of the
medical liability insurance industry by two of
the nation’s top academic experts found no
evidence that medical liability insurance is
overpriced or that insurance companies are to
blame for an insurance crisis that is forcing
doctors of medicine. The Angoff study was
called “critically flawed” with “errors and
shortcomings.” The study was done at the
request of the Health Care Liability Alliance
and is posted on its web site at
www.hcla.org.
PIAA: "Angoff report is a
hoax"
Independent actuaries with the firm
Towers Perrin found that a July 2005 report released
by the Center for Justice and Democracy and five
other “consumer groups” is incomplete and unsound.
Jay Angoff, an attorney employed by a personal
injury law firm, performed the analysis which found
that insurers were profiting at the expense of
physicians and that there was no medical liability
insurance crisis. See a
press release from the Physician Insurers
Association of American and the actuarial report
issued by Towers Perrin.
PIAA and Others Refute Report Issued by Plaintiff
Lawyers
The Center for Justice and Democracy, a nonprofit
organization receiving much of its support from
plaintiff lawyers, commissioned a report released in
July 2005 that asserted medical malpractice claim
payments are decreasing while premiums are
rising. The Physician Insurers Association of
America has created
talking points
that demonstrate the inadequacies and
misrepresentations in the report.
ACEP Journal
Reports Evidence of Defensive Medicine
Fear of malpractice litigation appears to affect emergency
department physicians' treatment decisions in evaluating
patients with a possible acute heart condition, suggests a
study in the on-line Annals of Emergency Medicine, the
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians.
Released July 13, 2005, the study found that physicians with
the greatest fear of malpractice litigation, as identified
by their responses to a questionnaire, were less likely to
discharge low-risk patients, more likely to admit patients
to a monitored bed, and more likely to order diagnostic
tests such as chest radiography. The report can be accessed
through the ACEP Web site at http://www.acep.org/webportal.
Defensive Medicine is Prevalent Among
Specialists in Litigious Environment
A survey of physicians
in six specialties at high risk of litigation (emergency
medicine, general surgery, orthopedic surgery,
neurosurgery, obstetrics/gynecology, and radiology)
in Pennsylvania in May 2003 found that defensive medicine is
highly prevalent, with potentially serious implications for
cost, access, and both technical and interpersonal
quality of care. The study is reported in the June 1, 2005 issue
of the Journal of the American Medical Association. See
http://jama.ama-assn.org/
Physician supply increases in states with malpractice award caps
States that have capped malpractice lawsuit awards have seen a
larger growth in the number of practicing physicians than states
without such caps according to a new study. Researchers at the
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
found that between 1970 and 2000 the number of physicians per
100,000 residents more than doubled in the 13 states that enacted
caps on non-economic damages during the 1980s, compared with an 83
percent physician growth rate in the 23 states that didn't cap
malpractice awards before 2000. The study, "Have State Caps on
Malpractice Awards Increased the Supply of Physicians?" was
published in the May 31, 2005 Health Affairs. See
www.ahrq.gov.
Ohio Medical Malpractice Commission Final Report
The
final report of the Ohio Medical Malpractice Commission was issued
April 27, 2005 and “strongly recommends” that the California-style tort
reforms (e.g., cap on non-economic damages) in SB 281 remain in
effect. While the commission considered it too soon to measures the
effects of SB 281, it found that evidence in states with similar tort
reform indicated it would stabilize the medical liability insurance
market. The commission also recommended formation of a “patient safety
center” and recommended against formation of a state-run patient
compensation fund at the present time due to unsatisfactory savings. See
www.ohioinsurance.gov/agent/medmal.htm for the other findings and
recommendations.
Coalition Finds California Tort Reform Effective
A study
released in February 2005 concludes that California's medical liability
reform law adopted in the 1970s accounts for the relatively low growth
in medical malpractice insurance costs in California and that any
increase in the amount of the $250,000 non-economic damage cap would
reduce access to care. The report is posted atwww.micra.org/MICRAStudy22805.pdf.
Congressional Budget Office Finds Studies
Validate Tort Reform
In June 2004, the Congressional Budget Office issued a report
in which it examined the effects of tort reform as measured by various
researchers. "A number of those studies have found that state-level tort
reforms have decreased the number of lawsuits filed, lowered the value of
insurance claims and damage awards, and increased insurers' profitability
as measured by payouts relative to premiums in the short run." CBO noted
its findings should be used cautiously given the limited number of
studies.
http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=5549&sequence=0
Medical Malpractice Insurance Myths Debunked
Lawrence E. Smarr, president of the Physicians Insurer
Association of America, debunks common arguments advanced by personal
injury lawyers in remarks made to the American College of Surgeons: there
is an insurance crisis, it did not result from stock market losses,
California's tort reform including damage caps is successful, and more.
http://www.facs.org/about/chapters/smarr.pdf
AHRQ: States with Damage Caps Have More
Physicians
Researchers at the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality (AHRQ) found that states with caps on noneconomic damages
experienced about 12 percent more physicians per capita than states
without such a cap--states that adopted a cap averaged 135 physicians per
100,000 citizens per county while states without a cap averaged 120.
Moreover, states with relatively high caps were less likely to experience
an increase in physician supply than states with lower caps. The study is
posted at
www.ahrq.gov/research/tortcaps/tortcaps.htm
Bricker & Eckler, LLP
Information on
pending tort reform legislation as tracked by Columbus law firm
Bricker & Eckler, LLP.
Bricker & Eckler, LLP Opinion Letter:
Guidelines for Hospitals to Evaluate Insurance Coverages
OHA's Medical Malpractice Insurance Crisis Task Force has twice requested
guidelines for hospitals to use, once in 2003 to evaluate insurance
coverages and address changes to medical staff bylaw requirements on
mandatory physician insurance coverage, and again in 2004 to evaluate
alternative risk financing vehicles such as risk retention groups and
captives.
Damage Caps Reduce Liability Insurance
Premiums
A report by Kenneth Thorpe, chairman of the health policy and management
department at the Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, found
that "premiums in states that cap awards are 17.1 percent lower than in
states that don’t cap."
See the report
Study Validates Cap on Non-Economic Damages as
Effective
Pennsylvania Medical Society reported a study by Milliman USA, Inc.
examined the impact of a $250,000 cap on damages in Pennsylvania and found
the cap would reduce losses and defense costs by 18 percent.
Full report
An earlier study by Milliman USA of the benefits of a cap on
non-economic damages reported found that from 1990 until 2001 the average
medical liability loss per physician was lower in states with caps.
Full report
Bricker & Eckler Opinion Letters: Mandatory
Arbitration
Senate Bill 281 made some changes to Ohio statutes that authorize the use of
mandatory arbitration in claims involving medical negligence. The statutes
were originally enacted in the 1970s but have not been used. OHA's
outside legal counsel, Bricker and Eckler LLP, studied the use of
mandatory arbitration, which appears limited by hospitals
GAO Report Finds Losses On Medical Malpractice
Claims Are Driving Up Malpractice Premiums
The General Accounting Office (GAO) released a report in June 2003,
"Medical Malpractice: Multiple Factors Have Contributed to Increased
Premiums" (GAO-03-702), which found that losses on medical malpractice
claims are the primary driver of rate increases. Find
the report at www.gao.gov
Checking the Financial Rating of an Insurer
To check your carrier's financial ratings, visit:
OHA Bulletins
Alternative Risk Financing and
Acceptable Coverage for Medical Staff
(Bulletin 03-018)
8.29.03
124th General Assembly
Enacts Tort
Reform (Bulletin 03-002)
2.14.03
Related Links
Questions?
Contact Rick Sites, OHA General Counsel, at
ricks@ohanet.org or 614.221.7614.
Back to
Medical Malpractice Main Page
© 2001-2009 OHA. Last updated
May 27, 2009.
Please direct comments, corrections or additions to: oha@ohanet.org
614.221.7614.
|